CMHC_notag_english.gif - 2 Kinvisible_pixel.GIF - 1.1 K previous more facts

In-Situ Thermal Testing of Wall Sections in NWT

Technical Series 90-223

Key Messages

  • Wall sections were tested from 4, post-1980 houses in Rankin Inlet to determine if insulating values had deteriorated over time.
  • All four houses had traditional wood frame construction with various wall configurations including interior rigid insulation, exterior rigid insulation, a chase for electricals and rigid support on two sides for the air and vapour barrier.
  • One house had been retrofitted with additional exterior insulation, but the measured R value did not meet the calculated values.
  • Tests were conducted using a guarded hot box calorimeter.
  • The other three houses tested higher RSI values than expected, but this may be due to the presence of baseboard heaters below the calorimeters.

Introduction

In 1989, research was carried out to evaluate the thermal performance of composite wall sections in Arctic housing. More specifically, the purpose was to determine if significant reductions in the insulating value of otherwise physically sound composite wall sections have occurred as a result of exposure to the harsh northern environment.

Background

Heat loss from houses in the Canadian Arctic is a major concern. Fuel oil, which is used extensively for space heating in the remote northern communities, is costly. Energy efficient houses capable of sustaining the harsh conditions associated with extended winters and cold temperatures have been built.

Concerns were expressed that the severe climate in the Arctic may, over time, reduce the insulating value of the composite wall sections used in energy efficient houses. Contributing factors include shrinkage of wood members, shifting of structures and degradation of individual components within composite wall sections. These changes may create air spaces between the insulation and the studs, allowing air to penetrate or circulate within the building envelope. Actual degradation of individual building components may then be caused by moisture migration into the building envelope.

Over the past few years, houses were constructed which would be less susceptible to deterioration resulting from exposure to this uniquely severe environment. The degree of success of these efforts has been a concern of building officials from the Northwest Territories and Yukon Housing Corporations (NWTHC and YHC) and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). To address this concern, an evaluation of the aged, as-built thermal performance of various wall assemblies was performed.

Objectives

The three main objectives of this project were:

  • to compare the insulation values of composite wall sections that had been exposed to harsh Arctic conditions for several years to theoretical values;
  • if reductions in insulation values were determined, to speculate on the mechanisms that may be causing these reductions; and
  • to recommend further field tests to measure those mechanisms.

Method

Heat loss was determined by attaching a five-sided calorimeter box to the wall and measuring the energy required by a heating element to maintain the temperature inside the box at the same level as room temperature. This energy consumption corresponds to the heat loss through the area of wall covered by the box. The system is referred to as a guarded hot box calorimeter.

The performance testing included inspections using infrared thermography equipment as well as continuous monitoring using the guarded hot box calorimetry instrumentation. The infrared thermography scans were conducted first to ensure that the wall sections selected were properly insulated and of typical construction. Calorimeter placement was dictated by available wall area to fit the hot box size. Effective (measured) RSI values of the wall sections were determined from the data obtained from continuous monitoring of the calorimeter.

House Descriptions

Four houses were selected in Rankin Inlet, NWT, each of different age and design. Older homes were compared to newer ones to determine if older sections showed greater deterioration. All houses were built after 1980, as pre-1980 houses are known to have deteriorated wall sections.

House 1

This nineplex was built in 1984 using traditional wood frame construction. The wall section is as shown in Figure 1. The unit tested was a three-bedroom dwelling, located at one end of the structure and the guarded hot box calorimeter was mounted on the northeast exterior wall. The overall calculated RSI value was 3.2 m2K/W.

House 2

This 1985 two-storey duplex is also of traditional wood frame construction. The wall section is shown in Figure 2. The tested section faced north on the first floor. The overall calculated RSI value was 4.5 m2K/W.

House 3

This 1976 single-detached unit had its walls upgraded in 1986. The retrofit wall section is shown in Figure 3. The tested section faced north. The overall calculated RSI value was 3.6 m2K/W.

House 4

This 1986 two-storey duplex was constructed using traditional wood framing. The wall section is shown in Figure 4. The tested section faced southeast. The overall calculated RSI value was 4.8 m2K/W.

House 1 Wall Section
FIGURE 1. House 1 Wall Section

House 2 Wall Section
FIGURE 2. House 2 Wall Section

House 3 Wall Section
FIGURE 3. House 3 Wall Section

House 4 Wall Section
FIGURE 4. House 4 Wall Section

Results

The effective RSI values measured in the four houses are presented in Table 1. Wall sections in the two duplex units were found to have the highest thermal resistance values. The measured values for houses 1, 2 and 4 (the nineplex and two duplex units) were about 13% higher than calculated. There are three possible reasons for this occurrence:

  • All three houses had baseboard heaters located directly below the calorimeter which may have decreased the load on the heating elements.
  • The insulation may have performed better than expected, since the component RSI values used in the calculations were based on laboratory measurements made at 24 C. As temperatures decrease, material insulating values generally increase.
  • There is always a level of experimental error.

TABLE 1. Results Summary

House
No.
House Type
Year of
Construction
Measured
RSI Value
Calculated
RSI Value
Percentage
Difference
1 Nineplex 1984 3.66 3.23 -13.3
2 Duplex 1985 5.09 4.50 -13.1
3 Single detached 1976 (1986 Retrofit) 2.11 3.63 +41.9
4 Duplex 1986 5.36 4.77 -12.4
Note:
Calculated (theoretical) RSI values were determined using individual component thermal resistance values, and adjustments made to account for thermal bridging of studs and strapping.

Conclusions

The results suggest that significant reductions in insulating value of composite wall sections in houses constructed after 1984 have not occurred.

To further substantiate concerns regarding gradual wall degradation from exposure to the northern environment, it is recommended that detailed infrared thermography inspections be conducted on many houses, encompassing a wide variety of wall construction types.

Identifying wall sections of sufficient surface area to accommodate the guarded box calorimeters was a difficult task. If further testing is to be carried out using guarded hot box calorimeters, it is recommended that smaller box sizes be used to allow for a greater choice in placement.

Resources

Research Report: In-Situ Testing of the Thermal Performance of Wall Sections in N.W.T., August 1989.
Research Consultants: G. K. Yuill and Associates Ltd.


previous facts more facts
 
Home Page | Newsletters |Fact Sheets
Contacts | Northern Related Links | Bulletin Board
Upcoming Events | Jobs

Please send any comments or suggestions to AHFC.